Musings on fancy ancient stonework!

-

You have to wonder at the cost of labour back in the 1500s, along with priorities in the stonework business. And I apologise in advance if I'm about to be something of an architecture heathen.

You see, I was visiting York and gazing up at the Minster, destroyed and rebuilt a number of times over the last 1000 years. And, while I was hugely impressed by the size of the thing (and yes, we went inside for the tour), as my eyes focussed in on some of the details, I started to notice something.

Details on the details. And those details had details added to them. Almost fractal.

As an example, take one of the very smallest spires on the Minster, only a few feet high and positioned a hundred feet off the ground. One of them is helpfully displayed on its own inside:

I can't really imagine the discussions between the foreman of the time and the stone masons, perched possibly precariously on 1500-era scaffolding, 100ft off the ground. 

"Yes, can you put in 50 little spires, each 5ft high, to really break up the stonework of the upper ledge"

"What sort of spire?" 

"Oh, just something plain and simple, after all, no one's going to see any detail because it's all so far off, we've been tasked with building a functional cathedral, after all."

Harumph, thinks the stonemason, and takes a pride in his work, so implements a system of intricate pointy bits and textures, taking days to complete. Per spire. (While, no doubt per-spiring - ahem, I'll get my coat!)

And my musing is, while you have to admire that commitment to his (or her) art, at the same time this simply couldn't be done today. You'd have to factor in their wages per hour and the cost of putting in 50 such sculpted spires would be utterly prohibitive. While the foreman was exactly right, it's impossible to see this detail from the ground unless you have binoculars - so, what exactly was the point in all this effort being put in?

The bottom line is that the point was art, and art like this wouldn't happen in 2022. So we should just appreciate its ancient existence, perhaps?

Comments

Martin said…
I don't know about medieval times but in 1991 I lived in Barcelona for three months and went twice a week to see a stone mason carve the decorations on an arch by hand with a hammer and chisels at La Sagrada Familia. While he was having a break I asked him who decides what design or pattern to use.I do he said, I have a feel of the rough stone and it tells me (he was being serious) I design it on paper with pencil and agree with my bosses.

Incidentally he did approximately a 30cm length of approx 10cm wide arch in three months. Sometimes he'd not work but be feeling and looking at the stone from various angles.

The block laying and construction is straight forward. Carving institu is for an artist only.
10:15 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wavelet - and better sounding speakers (and headphones) on Android...

-
Image
You may well be fairly happy with the audio output (speakers and headphones) on your existing Android phone. Or, like me, you may welcome an extra step up. Perhaps more bass/punch, clearer treble, or perhaps just a volume boost overall. Now, there have been various 'boost' utilities for Android in the past and they've been a bit patchy in how well they work. But Wavelet, discovered by Ted Salmon back in 2021, is a whole different kettle of fish, in that it works supremely well, with extra bass, clarity, and volume,   BUT has a very confusing interface. Which is why a brief tutorial is in order. The steps come from Ted in bullet point form, but expanded by me here and with screenshots, which will hopefully help. By the way, ignore the 'headphone specific' text in the app's title - it works perfectly well for speakers too. In fact, by definition, I'd say that it's really ONLY for speakers, since with headphones you've usually got plenty of natural i...
Read more

Bluetooth keyboard incorrect PIN or password - SOLVED

-
Image
Just in case this helps anyone else, I had a nightmare today with my Bluetooth keyboard and my Android phone - but I used some common sense and found a geeky solution. In my case it was a ZTE Axon 7 running Lineage OS and a Microsoft Universal Folding Keyboard (UFK), but I suspect this cure will work for more general issues. The symptom was that when I tried to connect a previously paired keyboard I first of all got just the raw Bluetooth address shown and not the keyboard name. And then, when I tried connecting, I got an "incorrect PIN or password" error message. No chance to reenter a PIN and no amount of restarting keyboard or phone would fix it. The cure seemed to be to reset something in the phone's Bluetooth system, but what? The keyboard wasn't showing up as paired, so I couldn't 'forget' it. I tracked it down in the end. Settings, Apps, then 'Show system' on the '...' menu. Find and tap on 'Bluetooth extensions'....
Read more

Why the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is better than the 15 Pro Max

-
Image
Forgive the click bait(y) title, but there's actual evidence here, I promise. Note that I did write an article before availability, putting forward worries and concerns , but I've now had hands-on to confirm a few things and report back.  Cased (of course, read the blooming' article!) Pro Maxes - 15 and 14 (with XtremeSkin, Aged Oak , in case you're wondering!) In fact, it's the first time ever in the iPhone line-up/evolution that I seriously think the old 'Pro Max' model can be argued to be  better than the new one. (Admittedly, that I already own the old one [14 Pro Max] and didn't really want to spend over £1000 on the 15 Pro Max possibly helps my argument from a personal perspective.) (There's one big win for the new model, of course. Type C connectivity has been a long time coming - but this will take several generations to become established in iPhone/Lightning households and maybe I'll come back to this in a future article.) My observat...
Read more